An Environmental Report Card
From: Robina Suwol
Date: 28 Jun 2003
Time: 04:46:21
Remote Name: 65.66.172.139
Comments
Date: 030626
Op/Ed, New York Times, June 26, 2003
On her way out the door, Christie Whitman has issued the Environmental
Protection Agency's first statistical assessment of the nation's environment.
The bottom line is that although much remains to be done, things are greatly
improved from 30 years ago. The air is healthier, the water cleaner. But
underneath the numbers, and of course unobserved in the report, lies an
exquisite irony: what has brought us here are the landmark environmental laws
of the early 1970's - laws that the industries bankrolling the Bush
administration have been fighting tooth and nail ever since, laws that the
administration itself has tried to amend or weaken.
The report has already acquired a certain notoriety because it omitted, on
White House orders, any meaningful discussion of global warming, a problem
that President Bush seems to think will go away if nobody talks about it. In a
sense, this may have been the administration's final insult to Mrs. Whitman,
who has been bounced around on other issues during her two-plus years as the
agency's administrator. Now most people are likely to remember her report,
which she had intended as an apolitical statistical portrait, for what it
leaves out rather than for the useful information it contains.
On the plus side, the report shows that air pollution has declined by 25
percent over the last three decades even as the country's population, economy
and vehicle traffic have exploded. Fully 94 percent of Americans are served by
drinking water systems that meet federal health standards, as opposed to 79
percent 10 years ago. Major rivers, like the Hudson, are no longer used as
industrial and municipal sewers. Yet in a sense we have just begun. More than
125 million Americans suffer from intermittent unhealthy air, 270,000 miles of
rivers and streams remain too polluted for fishing and swimming, coastal
estuaries are in generally poor shape, and suburban sprawl continues to devour
open space at an alarming rate.
The report is a compelling argument for preserving - and broadening where
necessary - the reach of environmental law. Mrs. Whitman recognized as much
when, in one of her last acts, she proposed tough new regulations on
construction equipment and other diesel-powered off-road vehicles, a huge and
lightly regulated source of air pollution. But she has spent most of her
tenure playing defense. The administration moved to weaken the existing Clean
Air Act without putting anything in its place. It has done little to regulate
farm runoff, a major source of water pollution. And Mrs. Whitman herself has
set in motion a review of the Clean Water Act that could leave over 60 percent
of the nation's streams and 20 million acres of wetlands exposed to
development and pollution.
Indeed, before she leaves town, and as a final legacy, Mrs. Whitman might
consider taking that unfortunate proposal off the table. That could make her
agency's next report even rosier.
* * *
Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
_______________________________________________
Checnet-forum mailing list
Last changed: March 14, 2006